Preview

One composer. Research, debate, and build-ready docs in reach.

How can I help you today?

Run a Research sprint on my idea

Start a Debate session

Generate a PRD from my brief

Create design.md file for my idea

I hear you're looking to build a product that helps developers rapidly convert private code repositories into production-ready open source projects. It sounds like you're aiming to automate key steps like documentation generation, security scanning, and compliance to significantly reduce manual effort and accelerate deployment and scaling for teams.

Does this sound right? Reply yes to continue, or tell me what to change.

Evidence first.

Cite sources, run a council pass, ship specs aligned with what held up.

1
Parallel memos
Independent drafts on one decision before you lock a story.
2
Blind cross-review
Peers score ideas without names attached.
3
Chair verdict
One readout: alignment, tension, gaps, next move.

Under the hood, your decision question hits a fixed pipeline: five advisor lenses each draft a memo in parallel; memos are anonymized (A–E) for peer review; each lens ranks the set, names blind spots, and returns a support / mixed / reject lean. A final chair pass reads attributed memos plus every review and outputs one verdict—agreement, tension, gaps, and a concrete recommendation—instead of a single turn that chases the latest prompt.

The point is to beat single-model bias and un-auditable back-and-forth. Parallel work plus blind cross-examination plus synthesis makes disagreement legible, reduces sycophancy, and leaves a document trail for roadmap and stakeholder handoffs—so “we debated it” is something you can actually show, not a vibe.